Draft — pending COA review. Rette derived these criteria from the ACOEM guidelines adopted into the MTUS. They are not COA documents and have not been signed off by a COA physician reviewer.

MTUS Treatment ChecklistbyRette

Utilization Review Checklist

Lateral and Medial Epicondylalgia

Derived from the ACOEM Elbow Disorders Guideline, edition 14 July 2025, as adopted into the California MTUS 2 January 2026. CPT 24357, 24358, 24359, 24999. ICD-10 M77.1, M77.0.

Draft — not reviewed or approved by COA. Prepared by Rette from the ACOEM guideline named above. This is not a COA document and does not reproduce COA’s own checklists.

Patient name: Claim #:

CriteriaCheck if documented

Confirmatory Diagnosis

Any one of the following

  • Confirmed diagnosis of lateral epicondylalgia

    A confirmed diagnosis of lateral epicondylalgia requires all of the following: — p. 126

    All of the following:

    • Lateral elbow pain

      ● lateral elbow pain, — p. 126

    • AND

      Tenderness over the lateral epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle

      ● tenderness over the lateral epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle, and — p. 126

    • AND

      Pain with resisted wrist extension or resisted middle finger extension

      ● pain with resisted wrist extension or resisted middle finger extension. — p. 126

  • OR

    Confirmed diagnosis of medial epicondylalgia

    A confirmed diagnosis of medial epicondylalgia requires all of the following: — p. 126

    All of the following:

    • Medial elbow pain

      ● medial elbow pain, — p. 126

    • AND

      Tenderness over the medial epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle

      ● tenderness over the medial epicondyle or just distal to the epicondyle, and — p. 126

    • AND

      Pain with resisted wrist flexion

      ● pain with resisted wrist flexion. — p. 126

Conservative Care

All of the following

  • Pain generally for at least 6 monthsat least 6 months

    ● pain generally for at least 6 months , although some limited exceptions where as little as 3 months of nonoperative management may be sufficient, and — p. 126

  • AND

    Insufficiently responsive to non-operative treatments including NSAIDs, elbow straps, stretching and strengthening exercises

    ● insufficiently responsive to non-operative treatments including NSAIDs, elbow straps, stretching and strengthening exercises — p. 126

Procedures — the guideline treats each separately

Surgical epicondylar release for chronic epicondylalgia

Recommended. Surgical epicondylar release is recommended for the treatment of chronic lateral or medial epicondylalgia.

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Insufficient Evidence (I) · p. 125

Indications — required:

  • Epicondylar release requested for chronic epicondylalgia

    Any of the three main surgical approaches are acceptable pending quality trials to further direct care (open, percutaneous and arthroscopic). — p. 126

Open, percutaneous and arthroscopic approaches are all acceptable to the guideline — it declines to prefer one pending better trials, so the approach chosen is not a ground for denial. The evidence grade is Insufficient (I), so the six months of symptoms and the failed non-operative trial are what carry the request.

Radiofrequency microtenotomy for chronic epicondylalgia

Recommended. Radiofrequency microtenotomy is recommended for the treatment of chronic lateral or medial epicondylalgia

Strength of Evidence — Recommended, Evidence (C) · p. 127

Indications — required:

  • Radiofrequency microtenotomy requested for chronic epicondylalgia

    Radiofrequency microtenotomy is recommended for the treatment of chronic lateral or medial epicondylalgia — p. 127

Microtenotomy carries a STRONGER evidence grade than open release — (C) against Insufficient (I) — on the same criteria. Worth naming explicitly if it is the procedure you intend, because the grade is the better one to be judged against.

Reviewing this for COA, or think a criterion is wrong?